deleted by creator

Yes, they are. They often actually need individuals to make their case, I know of several examples.

In data privacy cases there are ALWAYS people that will sue - there are collectives with money and lawyers.

I don’t understand how these glasses will work in the EU, where filming other people is against the law.

deleted by creator

The old question “if a tree falls in a forest, and there’s nobody to hear it, did it really fall or even exist?” The question was often asked in psychology tests, as it gives a hint how the tester is thinking. There are two answers: in a subjective universe, the tree didn’t exist, and it didn’t fall. Objectively spoken: it obviously fell and existed. There exist probably a number of options between these extremes. Now, if you propose an object that has never ever been observed and will NEVER EVER be observable, I would suggest the question as to its existence is irrelevant as it is unanswerable, and questions that are unanswerable are, for most scientists (and rational human beings), uninteresting.

Spot on.