megumin.org
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Innerworld@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 day ago

The Linux Kernel Organization now lets developers submit AI-generated code, as long as it complies with the guidelines, licensing, and attribution requirements

www.xda-developers.com

external-link
message-square
13
link
fedilink
63
external-link

The Linux Kernel Organization now lets developers submit AI-generated code, as long as it complies with the guidelines, licensing, and attribution requirements

www.xda-developers.com

Innerworld@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 day ago
message-square
13
link
fedilink
The Linux kernel now allows AI-written code, but you're on the hook for it
www.xda-developers.com
external-link
Your AI-generated code is still your code.
  • Dumhuvud@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    RedoxOS has a no-LLM policy: https://gitlab.redox-os.org/redox-os/redox/-/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#ai-policy

    • magikmw@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s just regarding labeling. It’s unenforcable to have a project “clean” of AI.

      • Dumhuvud@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s just regarding labeling.

        No, it’s not: https://old.reddit.com/r/Redox/comments/1rp57nq/redox_os_has_adopted_a_certificate_of_origin/o9ixfu9/?context=1

        • magikmw@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Ok I see the intent of BDFL is different, but the linked document only mentions labeling - I can only assume the low quality etc. issues are handled as a judgement call, and in that way I consider the “No AI whatsoever” rule unenforceable.

          If I use an LLM to generate code under my suprvision, review, quality check and test to be up to standard, how would it be detected I used AI if I don’t label it so? They’ll look for em-dashes in comments?

          • soc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            “Let’s not have rules, because some may break them!”

            🤡

Linux@programming.dev

linux@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !linux@programming.dev

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

  • !linux_memes@programming.dev
  • !linuxphones@lemmy.ca
  • our Matrix group chat
  • !reactos@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 267 users / day
  • 1.32K users / week
  • 5.02K users / month
  • 8.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 13.2K subscribers
  • 1.02K Posts
  • 8.61K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ategon@programming.dev
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.14
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org