Debian Project Leader Andreas Tille has addressed the ongoing debate over age-verification laws and their potential impact on free software operating systems. Long story short: he clarified that Debian has not adopted a position and is awaiting legal analysis.

In his latest “Bits from the DPL” message, Tille stated that the main question is whether operating systems and package distribution mechanisms might be required to provide age-related information to applications.

He noted that Debian and other projects are discussing the issue, and that Software in the Public Interest, a non-profit corporation founded to act as a fiscal sponsor for organizations that develop open-source software and hardware, has begun seeking legal guidance.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Slap a label on it that it’s not legal to use in those areas and move on while they fight it out legally. It’s distributed via p2p anyway so if people in those places still want to use it they can. Absolutely no reason to bend on this.

    • UNY0N@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree that that solves some problems, 100%. But I’ve seen the downward slide of society take hard-fought civil rights away for several decades now. It’s never a sudden process, it always starts small and then slowly grows.

      This is just the beginning, and it should be fought against with tooth and nail now, not just postponed so that we have to deal with this issue once the fascists already have some momentum.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Which is why I included the bit about fighting it out legally.

        But I’ve seen the downward slide of society take hard-fought civil rights away for several decades now. It’s never a sudden process, it always starts small and then slowly grows.

        That’s what happens by adding features that comply with these stupid laws. Step one is NOT doing that. People can still use the software even if it doesn’t comply. What is the government going to do break into everyone’s home and look at their computers?

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The CA one, at least from what I remember, doesn’t even place any expectations on a user. Even if a user did use an OS that was noncompliant, they would not be violating any laws for doing so, from what I understand.