• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    tl;dr it was Meta (because of course it was). It is a little strange though, I would think they would absolutely want this sort of PII but they’re pushing for Google and Apple to deal with it.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m guessing one of the motives is to be able to get more data from non meta users. If the API exists at the operating system level, they can then use the code behind that stupid little Facebook button that every website has to get user age as well as the normal browser fingerprinting data.

            • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              That is incorrect, the OS communicates the data to any “app” running on the system that asks for it. The text of the bill (the CA bill specifically is the one I have read) states that any developer of any app must ask for the age bracket from either the OS or the App Store, so the OS will have to have the API open to any “app” running on the device, not just the “app store”. Also, they define “app store” as any website or software that people can download and install software from, which is VERY broad.

            • chaogomu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              And everything else, including via the little Facebook button on various pages.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Zuck is on board with destroying democracy as much as Theil, otherwise Zuck wouldn’t have personally hired Joel Kaplan back in 2009.

        • Zephorah@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Well of course he is. Billionaires believe they are special little kings who deserve far more than democracy can ever offer them. One vote? Are you kidding? Just one vote each? Not for them. They deserve more. And so, they’re intent on destroying it for millions.

          Petty, ambitious tyrants, down to the stunted emotional growth of past rulers. Grow up with everyone telling you you’re a king vs growing into incredible money before you’ve finished developing into a full adult.

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They don’t want to deal with the costs, just get the data. At least that’s what I got from the text, as a reason why they were pushing to make social networks extempt and keep it on app/OS level.

      Fuckers.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        But they’re not getting the data. The data is going to Google, MS and Apple. All they’re getting is an age bracket.

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          For now… But they are pushing laws that require the infrastructure for data harvesting be built into the OS level and then broadcast the data to any program that asks for it without question…

    • 13igTyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I recall reading an article a few days ago saying it was Meta behind it. I feel like tons of research wasn’t needed when the answer key was already known.