Ubuntu has taken another step that, honestly, leaves me scratching my head. While most distributions try to offer as many convenient GUI tools as possible to help users manage every part of their system, Ubuntu… apparently sees things a bit differently.
I say this because Ubuntu 26.04 LTS (scheduled for release on April, 23) will no longer ship the long-standing “Software & Updates” graphical tool by default on fresh desktop installs, following a change proposed in Launchpad as bug 2140527.
The adjustment replaces the software-properties-gtk package in the desktop seed with software-properties-common, effectively removing the visible GUI while keeping the underlying repository management tools in place.
this is why you should Debian
I usually use [K]ubuntu because I always try to install Debian first, but it ships with kernels so outdated that it rarely “just works” on the not-particularly-weird hardware I throw at it. That’s understandable when it’s missing drivers for my AMD 9070 XT GPU on launch day, but not so much when it’s missing drivers for the Intel AX101 wifi chipset that got released 3.5 years before. (I’ve also experienced weird installation failures with Debian related to the partitioning and/or bootloader, but I don’t remember the details of those right now. Point is, Ubuntu is – unfortunately – more reliable to install without tweaking or troubleshooting, in my experience.)
Then Fedora may be an option for you. They have a KDE spin.
Besides that, Debian is my default distro nowadays; everything just works for me.
I was using Gentoo previously for many years, because I didn’t require out-of-the-box back then.
I’m too lazy and set in my ways to switch away from
apt.(I also used Gentoo, many years ago when I could actually be bothered.)
By sheer coincidence, I just made an install image yesterday and will be switching soon
nice, Debian is more stable and you will have an easy switch, use the graphical install.
This is what really pisses me off about the Linux community. Everyone says the same thing about every distro, except Arch. That shits apparently for hardcore CLI only programmers or something.
Mint’s whole paradigm is an OS that emphasizes stability and usability and you claim Debian is more stable even though it’s the cutting edge base of an entire distro tree while Mint is 2 years behind it’s Ubuntu base to ensure functionality? Make it make sense.
You’re a little confused about how this stuff works. Debian is not cutting-edge.
E: btw “not cutting-edge” is neither inherently positive, nor inherently negative
Well Mint is based on Ubuntu (unless you get the Debian Edition) and Ubuntu is based on Debian sooo…
Basically the majority of Linux distros are based on either Debian, Fedora or Arch. IMHO it’s usually best to go with one of the originals, not the derivatives. Although I will admit Ubuntu has made Debian a lot better over the years, but that’s only because they took the bits from Ubuntu that actually made sense and ignored the rest.
I was just thinking about swapping from Mint to Debian the other day actually…
you can try linux mint debian edition. i love it so far <3
I might have to check that out, thanks!