ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Linux@programming.devEnglish · edit-24 days agoWayland didn’t kill Linux desktops, but it did expose their weakest assumptions [EDIT: Warning, article likely written with AI assistance]www.xda-developers.comexternal-linkmessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up1171arrow-down129
arrow-up1142arrow-down1external-linkWayland didn’t kill Linux desktops, but it did expose their weakest assumptions [EDIT: Warning, article likely written with AI assistance]www.xda-developers.comProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Linux@programming.devEnglish · edit-24 days agomessage-square77linkfedilink
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·5 days agoPeople use windows because it has decades of backwards compatibility sort of.
minus-squarespartanatreyu@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·5 days agoThat should be: People use used windows because it has had decades of backwards compatibility sort of. Nowadays: it has current compatibility sort of. Microsoft is a mess now, so it’s no surprise that their current Windows version is also a mess.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 days agoFor the most part they just didn’t update. See XP usage.
People use windows because it has decades of backwards compatibility sort of.
That should be:
People
useused windows because ithashad decades of backwards compatibility sort of.Nowadays: it has current compatibility sort of.
Microsoft is a mess now, so it’s no surprise that their current Windows version is also a mess.
For the most part they just didn’t update.
See XP usage.