Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 19 hours agoBreaking news!!lemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1784arrow-down117
arrow-up1767arrow-down1external-linkBreaking news!!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 19 hours agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·7 hours agoSMH with some serious management we could double that number of lines in mere months. (Do I have to put the / ?)
minus-squareGloomyDorje@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·4 hours ago SMH with some serious management we could double that number of lines in mere months. But why? “Bigger is better” is realy just bullshit here. If the code has a good quality, going for quantity just for the sake of it is just plane stupid. (Do I have to put the / ?) On Lemmy? Hell yes.
SMH with some serious management we could double that number of lines in mere months.
(Do I have to put the / ?)
But why? “Bigger is better” is realy just bullshit here. If the code has a good quality, going for quantity just for the sake of it is just plane stupid.
On Lemmy? Hell yes.