• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe. If they do it’s going to represent a pretty dramatic shift away from backwards compatibility, which has always been the biggest defining characteristic of Windows. Probably not for Enterprise, but maybe for Personal?

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, that’s fine for handling some stuff, but there are some very old applications still in use that were coded by a programmer who died twenty years ago who counted on Windows bugs. A lot of companies refuse to spend the money to upgrade or replace those systems, and so Microsoft has maintained compatibility for them ever since. Wine hasn’t reached full parity for those bugs, at least so far.

        • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The key word being so far. A company like Microsoft would be able to ramp up wine development substantially, if they decided to. If I’m not mistaken, these very old legacy 16 and 32 bit apps have to be run on emulators running old versions of windows anyways - in these cases the OS running the emulator doesn’t matter anyways.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            True! If they committed back to the Linux kernel and the Wine project, this would be a huge boon. And it might happen someday, I guess; they’ve contributed to other FOSS projects. They’ve also built the WSL which is just one transposition away from a LSW, so who knows.