Fastfetch 2.67 adds an experimental browser-based config editor, interactive TUI generation, watch mode, and multiple Linux-related fixes.
Fastfetch 2.67 adds an experimental browser-based config editor, interactive TUI generation, watch mode, and multiple Linux-related fixes.
Ever tried
fish_config? :)I’m not sure what exactly that is.
fastfetch --config fish_configorfastfetch --config fishdoesn’t work. So I guess that answers your question. :DI mean that
fish_configis an example of something “simple”, like shell,which can be configured by a web browser.
From the fish shell manual,
fish_config:Ah I see. I tried Fish several times before. Without getting into why I’m not using it, I totally forgot it had a web interface. I guess it makes sense for a shell, because if you screw the config up, then at least you can reconfigure it in the browser. That is the only use case I could think of that would be useful “to me”. But fastfetch on the other hand, is not a huge thing like a shell. I mean it would be bloat if we suddenly could configure
grepor other terminal applications in the browser too. Wouldn’t it? That is how it feels to me.Off course I’m not gatekeeping here, don’t get me wrong. Everyone should use and do what they want. I personally just don’t like the idea for fastfetch specifically to have a web interface. Not because it hurts me, but I think it makes the code of the program more complicated and bigger, potentially introducing bugs or security issues. For … nothing (in my opinion).