• otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, this could be referring to most open-source projects. I’d imagine many of the popular ones were originally made to solve a problem for themselves and then everyone jumps onboard with that solution.

    Linux itself also kinda fits here considering it was meant to just sort of be a small project in the beginning and I doubt Linus ever could have predicted what it became.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have a tiny php library for a somewhat popular framework. It was made so a company could protect a very old database and certain tables. It started as a one off 9 years ago. It was one php file of less than 50 lines.

      As of this month it has been downloaded 2 million times. I still can’t believe its been used this much. And I’m the only maintainer. If I wanted to I could ruin a lot of peoples days. But I won’t.

      In a couple of decades, we are going to have large swaths of code that will outlive its creators being used on essential infrastructure.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      “most” is a bit strong. Many open source projects never get users or any kind of traction, they’re just a passion project for the author. The lucky few fill a need and take off. Review the package usage count on npm or the GitHub stars for projects - there’s a tiny fraction that make it big.

      • mech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Considering that making it big just means a lot of responsibility, angry messages, AI-driven bug reports and still no pay, I wouldn’t call them lucky.