(No provocation)

I see these reasons:

  • newbie
  • lazy (don’t wanna edit config files etc.)
  • unique features (like assistant/toolbox, some optimizations like in cachyos)
  • wanna check how different systems are set up (that’s rather distrohopping)

Personally, I used manjaro i3 when I was beigginer and wanted to see how tiling WM should be configured (check out ranger config, for example). But after some time, I don’t see reasons why not to just customize pure arch (same with debian and debian-based distros).

  • hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use both CachyOS (on my steam deck) and pure Arch on my Desktop, and Laptop.

    I like both. But I just don’t feel like reinstalling my OS, though I was investigating using the CachyOS kernel and Repos within my current Arch install; and ultimately decided I would go CachyOS if I really wanted those optimizations. Not sure what performance gain from that switch I would realistically see.

    I am not opposed to either route. Whatever tool fits the job. CachyOS on my Steam Deck because I didn’t want an atomic distro, even if I do see the benfits. I have had good experience with CachyOS on my Steam Deck.

    Your reasons and mileage may vary.