I just explained to you how your own response confirms my point but be upset over someone making fun of you for stating the headline of their reference as some interesting insight.

You didn’t even bother to argue my point. You repeated the headline of the article that I send you. Are you sure that I need to learn that?

I would have given you a proper response if your response would have been. Calling something “controversial” is literally saying that there are conflicting opinions on the matter, which means it is NOT no brainer.

he just moved to types via JSDoc which is run through the TS compiler, as well as to .d.ts files.

Congratulations, you read the headline.

But “just” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. It is literally why he moved.

https://devclass.com/2023/05/11/typescript-is-not-worth-it-for-developing-libraries-says-svelte-author-as-team-switches-to-javascript-and-jsdoc/

Some people disagree with it being a no brainer.