Somebody else mentioned that it’s was actually merged by microsft devs. Which we can now see why that it is a tragedy that they are allowed to contribute at all.

Can we have a rule that if you work for microslop then you are invalidated from working on any Linux project? Doesn’t that sound reasonable?

Why are all the “progressive” states first in line?

So he’s not allowed to craft his own morals? Maybe he would turn them down if they supported a corrupt military complex. Your argument sounds like it has an agenda.

I’ve never worried in a shop that uses Windows s screen. That’s insane.

Well to be fair, you might be the only one using your third eye.

Sounds like he figured he would see last able to work with another os in his own environment.

What’s surprising me is that it passed unanimously with 99 votes in Louisiana House. I know Louisiana is as dead red as it can possibly be, but still, not a single nay for such an Orwellian book bill??

You’re probably getting flagged. You have to be just slightly off. Miss one or two by a square or two. And remember that image so you repeat it every time.

Yeah this is BS. They had one the best Linux contributers in their corner developing his LXC for Canonical but even he eventually was tired if their shenanigans and re-invented LXD in the new and improved incus.

I’ve tried Ubuntu a couple times in the past 5 years and it’s the sone of same type of frustrations I had with Windows.

I always thought that scp was more secure than rsync. I remember back in the day when I “graduated” to scp from rsync. So in reality, did I regress?

At this point I’m starting to wonder if Canonical is in the Epstein files.

NeoVim with tmux is pretty awesome.

Some people like Helix though.

Windows UI is just one giant cluster of dark patterns.

Yeah but everyone in the files are no surprise. Linus would definitely be surprising. You can probably picture everyone that is in the files and you will probably be correct.

No LSP? I have to look this up!

If you’re in a jvm or Microsoft heavy environment then maybe so.

My comment was more about how I feel. Wine is a choice. It’s a choice to turn off better choices out there. It’s a choice to not be strong and not take the leap to other open source alternatives. It’s a choice to keep putting money in the oligarch’s pocket.

My comment is to encourage people to turn off their fears and make that leap. It’s to encourage people to try out the alternatives and support the open source community.

But wine is also a choice for when you’re forced to use an app that your company or client requires. But if your not the that category I encourage you to try out the open source alternative.

My comment is also based on the fact that making corporate apps more accessible and mainstreamed to Linux makes better (designed) apps less supported and less robust.

The opposite. Wine is a crutch stopping people from choice and keeping money in the oligarch’s pocket instead of people to taking the leap and contributing to open source expansion that allows us to have choice. But I think you already knew that and chose to take a cheap shot instead for karma.

Would have taken you more seriously if you made an argument that wine at least allows people to dip their toes in the Linux community but no, you chose to sound like a “badass” instead.

Choice is good. Hate is bad.