DacoTaco

Note to self: read full post. I used eduroam when i worked for a university and it just worked. We had set it up for our full ad+username to be the username and our ad password was the pass and that just worked so idk.
I did lookup the android settings they said to use and used those in linux though

This. This is how i feel about ml/llm/ai tech.
Im going to give a lecture this year about mcp, what it is and what it does, with a live demo of letting an llm see what an application does ( via an reverse engineering api with an mcp endpoint ) and recreate it in .net ( via the build in vscode mcp ).
That, or i might make an old api to access data, attach some mcp endpoints and let a lmm design some basic ( = aka to be validated and build upon by an actual engineer!! ) structures of the data for migration purposes and maybe even let it migrate some data depending on how my poc goes.

The tech is cool as hell, but what its used for and how companies throw it against everything, even if it has no added value, is making me puke and hate it so bad…
Even the way llm’s are trained make me puke. Fuck you all companies out there

I agree they should have sent a patch to the grub source, but keep in mind big software companies like microsoft, Verizon, … do not normally allow their product teams to send a patch or PR to open source projects. This is because in their contract it states that all code written on and during company times is owned by the company. This means that it is impossible for them to make a patch or PR because it would conflict with the projects licence and fact its open source.
This changes when the team explicitly works on the foss product/project like the ms wsl team or the team working on linux supporting azure hardware, but that is an exception. I do not believe the microsoft kernel/bootloader team is allowed to send patches to grub.

Its a terrible thing, and it shouldnt be, but thats the fact of the world atm.