ColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoWhat have I done?lemmy.caimagemessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1177arrow-down1imageWhat have I done?lemmy.caColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square59linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejuipeltje@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 day agoYou have become systemd-free
minus-squareCoki91@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoYeah it is but systemd is a suite of apps (see, a collective) and elogind is a standalone, the claim is still true
minus-squarefurry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoi could be wrong here but didnt elogind need to be patched to work with other inits?
minus-squarejuipeltje@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoI don’t think elogind hooks into other inits directly, but it it is a fork of the logind part of systemd that has been altered so that it can work without systemd, if that’s what you mean.
You have become systemd-free
Isnt elogind part of systemd?
Yeah it is but systemd is a suite of apps (see, a collective) and elogind is a standalone, the claim is still true
i could be wrong here but didnt elogind need to be patched to work with other inits?
I don’t think elogind hooks into other inits directly, but it it is a fork of the logind part of systemd that has been altered so that it can work without systemd, if that’s what you mean.