I’m not a computer expert or planning to be. I’m just a computer user, a coder, a gamer, and I think I will get the opportunity to afford cheaper PCs if I use the Arch distro from Linux which is very lightweight and fast. I’ve heard Microsoft forces you to bloat your PC with win11.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    My son had a netbook with win10 and office. This ate 27 of the 32 GB the thing had. An “important update” of 8 GB did not work, putting the device in a download and fail cycle.

    I installed Linux on this machine - Kubuntu, with LibreOffice and a load of extra software. Took only about 4 GB of space.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Don’t know about Fedora. And you would have to do odd things to bloat any Linux distribution anywhere near a Winslop system.

      • yellow [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Honestly, for any semi-modern hardware, the different amount of “bloat” between any two distros is small enough to be irrelevent for most everything you would do on a computer up to and including gaming, especially compared against Windows. Yes, Arch may be less bloated than, say, Ubuntu, but are you really going to notice or care that your system is idling at 1.2 GB of RAM usage instead of 800 MB?

    • EastofEdson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I have an old netbook that ran win10 poorly. I have since put Debian on it and it’s been great.