not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 hours agoIs Windows FOSS now?lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square62linkfedilinkarrow-up1355arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1349arrow-down1imageIs Windows FOSS now?lemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 hours agomessage-square62linkfedilinkfile-text
https://zomglol.wtf/@jamie/116059523957674208 https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 hours ago supposition Would you be willing to elaborate a little more to raise credibility in light of this comment? Like, what are the links posted saying then, if not the statement in this post, by your expert analysis?
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@feddit.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-23 hours agoOh yarr, heck yeah, here look at this part right here: " " That’s where the article doesn’t say the generative works are public domain. And furthermore this other part: " " Is where it doesn’t say all terms of service contracts between the user and company are magically invalidated. Do you have any other questions I can answer by presenting quotes of the parts that are not there? P.S. Why are you quoting Supposition, I literally used the same term as the comment above it.
Would you be willing to elaborate a little more to raise credibility in light of this comment?
Like, what are the links posted saying then, if not the statement in this post, by your expert analysis?
Oh yarr, heck yeah, here look at this part right here:
That’s where the article doesn’t say the generative works are public domain. And furthermore this other part:
Is where it doesn’t say all terms of service contracts between the user and company are magically invalidated.
Do you have any other questions I can answer by presenting quotes of the parts that are not there?
P.S. Why are you quoting Supposition, I literally used the same term as the comment above it.