• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    See that’s kind of what I’m talking about. The monkeys who pressed the buttons to make the AI Generate the code isn’t the computer, it isn’t the user, it’s the employees at the AI company. My advice is that until laws are properly in place that we shouldn’t use AI for any generative industry.

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The AI company didn’t do shit. They stole apples from someone elses tree and threw it in a blender. They didn’t make the apples, nor did they buy them, so they don’t legally own the juice.

      • Klear@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        While I agree with the general idea, please don’t call piracy “stealing”. It’s not stealing, whether you do it or some giant corpo.

        • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          While I agree², their use of “steal” makes sense in the analogy because the apple doesn’t belong to the “thief”; besides, you can’t pirate an apple

          • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            Evidently you can!

            “Apple piracy is a problem,” said Lynnell Brandt, chief executive officer of Proprietary Variety Management, the Yakima firm hired to handle the Cosmic Crisp rollout. “Some are propagating trees without permission. Some are stolen in the middle of the night.”

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If the AI produces verbatim the licensed works of others then the others own it.

        If the AI took individual unlicensed elements and pieced them together then the AI Company owns it.

        In any and every case, neither the User nor the Public Domain owns it. Moral of the story is: never use AI for anything.

        • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The AI company stole other people’s code, threw it into a blender, and is selling the output. They didn’t do any real work, and they don’t own the materials. They have no legal claim over the result. You do not own a car you made from stolen parts, no matter how many cars you stole from.

          Stop trying to imply your buddies at AI companies have value.

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            We appear to be talking in circles.

            I’m literally sitting here telling people it isn’t safe to use AI Code, you’re doing the opposite, and you’re accusing me of being buddies with the Slop Companies?

            • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Yes. You’re giving the companies WAY too much credit for owning the blender they throw stolen content into, and you’re even trying to give them ownership of what clearly doesn’t belong to them. I’m sure they’re just as eager to claim they did all the work and license the materials they use as you are.

              I try not to call people idiots in debates, so there’s really only one reason you’d be giving them so much support.

              • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I guarantee you that the AI Companies don’t give a single fuck about our opinion on copyrightable status, they’ve made an industry off of ignoring copyright laws entirely, and are instead salivating at the idea of a bunch of fucking idiots putting their slop code in everything so that they can try to enforce rights on it later.