Hello. I am going to try Debian for the first time, although I have been a Linux user for years. For a user with experience in Linux and for non-technical use of the system, is it more advisable to use Debian stable or testing? Thanks
Start with stable. You can migrate a stable installation to testing later if you’re so inclined.
Testing really is for testing. If you like to tinker and don’t mind the occasional breakage, testing can be great to help the project by trying out newer software and reporting bugs. Otherwise, stable with backports and/or flatpaks if you need newer packages will be a lot more relaxing.
Stable for me, want my OS to be boring and unsurprising. I also don’t have any brand new hardware, that could be a consideration on which version (or which distro) to use.
Testing becomes the next stable so it’s not a huge jump in the grand scheme of things but I don’t personally have that much time to figure out new OS issues. But maybe I’d install testing or unstable on a spare machine that isn’t my main day-to-day system.
Stability is the main reason to use Debian in the first place. If you’re not going to use stable, then you might as well use a different distro.
I have debated this myself - Stable or Sid. I want new things but I don’t really have the time or energy to fix any added issues due to new/untested stuff, so I use Stable. Sure, you might not get all the newest bits, but if you use your computer to do basic things and not expect to run newest triple A game titles with the newest Nvidia GPU (actually don’t know if that would be an issue at all) and don’t care too much about the new login manager coming in Plasma 6.6, then Stable is probably just fine. My laptop goes to sleep and wakes up every time - the most Stable thing on my computer since removing Windows 11.
I would go stable. I see testing branches for when you want to test your applications or workflows before the update is live.
Just go unstable (sid). Do not let the name scare you, been running it for decades. Debian unstable is a lot more stable than other distros main line.
Every now and then a package might be broken, usually due to missing dependencies. But it is fixed within hours usually.
Stable
Stable. If you really want to use bleeding edge, I would use sid over testing. It breaks marginally more often, but gets fixed quicker.
Go stable until there’s no option
