megumin.org
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish ·
edit-2
2 days ago

When your phone has a menu that NO user in the UNIVERSE would ever have any reason to touch but then you get to 🥵

piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone

message-square
76
link
fedilink
531

When your phone has a menu that NO user in the UNIVERSE would ever have any reason to touch but then you get to 🥵

piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone

printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish ·
edit-2
2 days ago
message-square
76
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Thanks for the tip! I can’t imagine what the person was thinking who down voted this. Just have slipped on the wrong button.

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No problem! 😊 Fortunately, my instance doesn’t support downvotes. 😎

      Edit: I think…

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Only had one on my device, but I disabled it. Even if this one isn’t openly compromised like the others, it was a big sign that the company is either incompetent or corrupt (or both).

  • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    2²

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    https://i.imgur.com/ee11bKx.png

    44 comments as I open the thread

    https://i.imgur.com/bbJkJPj.png

    4 options to disable

    AUGH!!! IT’S A CONSPIRACY!!!

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      24 hours ago

      When you touch but(t)

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Somebody just knocked on my door. I’m arming myself. Right now. 🔪

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you arming your… forearms? FOREarms??? hahahHAHahaHAHAAAAHAHahaaaaHAHAAa!!!1!1!111eleventy

        ;-)

  • micgerne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    2 days ago

    there’s 4 of them, coincidence or conspiracy?

    • klankin@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thats just how they remembered their private key

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Well now you’ve put me on a list. Thanks.

  • meejle@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    If anyone else here uses AdGuard, the latest version of their app rejects the affected certificates. 👍

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thank is for the reminder.

    • chmod755@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Hi there 0118 999 881 999 119 725…3.

      Nice username.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You know what’s funny? That scene where Moss confuses fire and golf… “Four! I mean, five! I mean, fire!”
        Seems apt lol

  • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve never looked at this list before. Quite a large number of them. Is there any way for me to know which ones I shouldn’t have enabled?

    • wyrmsbane@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You should not have to disable any of them. All the affected certificates have likely been revoked by now, and any modern web browser/application will pull the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) and know to not trust them.

      Source: Former IT Engineer

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        web browsers, yes. almost anything else, no, unless you still receive system updates.

    • goatinspace@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      emSign, eMudhra

      • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You’re saying to turn those off?

        • goatinspace@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Ja; Sí; Oui; はい; Ναι; Ano; Tak; Да; Ja, ja; Igen; jā; Kyllä; Jah; 是的; Já, já; no.

          • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            no

            Sorry, I’m getting mixed signals here.

            • modus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Yeah, no man. Don’t not toggle it.

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Without having any specialized knowledge on the subject, I’d say, start frequenting cyber security forums, follow youtubers who cover such topics and just keep yourself up to date on matters cyber. Or start researching the CAs one by one.

  • SteveTech@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    FYI, G3 is the only one listed with the issue, the others are fine AFAIK. But if you don’t trust eMudhra at all after that, then that’s fair.

    Edit: Actually it’s the intermediate certs that are compromised, the roots are still fine, but many of them come from the G3 root cert (and Sectigo’s AAA Certificate Services)

    Source: https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com/

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, thanks for that! 😊 I just heard that they quit the TLS business all together.

      • SteveTech@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, my understanding was they’re not issuing new certificates, but the current ones are still valid until they’ve expired.

        • slazer2au@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Recently learned that root CA don’t actually expire. Yes, they have an expiration date, but nothing pays attention to it for a CA.

          • SteveTech@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well you can’t sign new certs (with the current date) with an expired root/intermediate cert, but the root/intermediate cert expiring doesn’t strictly invalidate the already signed certs.

            But I was more talking about the end-user certificates in the previous comment.

    • who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Excerpt from that page, for Android:

      • eMudhra Technologies Limited: emSign ECC Root CA - G3
      • Comodo CA Limited: AAA Certificate Services

      Of course, people using an Android variant that still gets regular updates are unlikely to need manual disables, since an update will take care of it.

    • redjard@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      They closed shop entirely, so there won’t be any new certs signed anyway

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        entirely? aren’t they still signing business documents?

        • redjard@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It appears so, inside India anyway.
          I saw some of the compromised certs were code signing ones, but it seems the “DSC” certificate infrastructure they advertise for documents is something else entirely (“issued under the Government of India guidelines”).

          The kind of cert that lets you sign a pdf and have everyone see it pop up in adobe reader won’t be a thing anymore since they’ll end their CA activities. (Chrome already removed their root cert, many other places will have done the same. Who wants certs that don’t work everywhere?)

          Also, given the state of emudhras online presence I saw when I just looked all that up, I’m not convinced the company will be around much longer either. One of the first domains I landed on had a cert that expired in August. Another domain is completely dead.

  • iuminou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    4

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      4? That’s the kind of crypto key an idiot would use on his luggage!

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      XPrQrxdU1gtfyHy.jpg

      • iuminou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        4

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, the post is exactly about the 4, so… yes.

  • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I once tried to disable all but the ones I actually need. There are close to 200 CAs trusted by my devices and I only need to trust about 15 of them. But it’s a colossal pain in the ass to figure out which CA an app needs, so I abandoned that experiment.

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I too had that ambition once, but I didn’t even know where to begin, since I don’t know how to find out which once my apps, websites and other services actually need. Other than investigating whole chains of collaboration between the various owners and devs of those services. Arduous much? 😅

      • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I used a proxy to look up which servers the app was trying to talk to, looked up the cert from the server and which CA I needed. It was very arduous, especially when you installed a new app and just wanted to use it, e.g. for parking. This made me stop doing this. When giving talks to junior devs I used to explain that security and convenience are almost always on opposite sites and you need to figure out where between the two extremes you want to sit. In this case I opted for convenience.

      • Hedup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Arduous much?

        Sounds like a job for a machine.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh stop. You’ll never get this corner of the internet to admit such things.

        • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Careful! They’re gonna whoop our asses: EbEE4QI3SrSHZKV.jpg

  • goatinspace@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

  • exdor@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Shouldnt you also disable the “Comodo” ones?

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pray tell 🤔

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        they were/are a shittier-than-average CA that got famously hacked in 2011 and less famously other times; later they bizarrely tried to trademark the name “Lets Encrypt” (after the real Lets Encrypt already existed). Since 2022 they’re called “Xcitium” and “Sectigo”.

        • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Holy crap, that is some valuable insight! Thanks! :D

        • Kojichan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I remember thay Lets Encrypt fiasco. Certainly made it hard to figure out the right LE cert when installing onto client websites.

  • halendos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thanks for reminding me to do that!

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      No problem! But as I told another person, I’m only doing this because I’m not updating my phone anymore, because One UI 8 and above have disabled unlocking of the bootloader. If you’re not rooted and you are still receiving updates from the vendor and Google, then I can’t imagine this being useful.

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Where did you find that?

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      On Android:

      Security and privacy -> more security settings -> view certificates

      Or go to settings and serach of certificates in the search bar

      • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks! How was this not widely spread on day 1? Why wasn’t it pushed as an ota update to deactivate them?

        • hayvan@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          eMudhra invalidated their insecure certificates and released renewed ones as far as I know.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            you can’t invalidate already signed certificates. The major browsers use a block list that can be updated at any time in order to revoke certificates from use in that location. but otherwise everything still continues to use them. Firefox uses OneCRL and CRLite. Chrome uses CRLsets.

          • modus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            And has now “gotten out of the business.”

            • hayvan@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Only from CA business, which is a small part of what they do. But I guess loss of trust hurt their other business too.

          • RustySharp@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            47
            ·
            1 day ago

            The new ones are 10 times more secure.

            The key is now “40”

            • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              There it is again. You’re shining today. 🤣

              • RustySharp@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Just like my phone. Dark mode is only available for Android 10 onwards.

                • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Great last one before bed 😂🩷 but fr you BELOW Android 10? 😱

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks, found it

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Settings - Security and privacy - More security settings - View security certificates

      Mind you, I’m using an outdated Android 15 with a similarly outdated One UI 7. I hope that either AOSP or Samsung already have patched emudhra out of the latest releases? I’m only doing this because I’m not updating my phone anymore, because One UI 8 and above have disabled unlocking of the bootloader.

      • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        outdated Android 15 with a similarly outdated One UI 7

        …outdated @ 15 w/ 7?

        • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Good God WHAT are you running 😂😂😂

          • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            Uhhh, well on my most up to date device its at least a double digit android version.

            • RustySharp@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 day ago

              8.0 is double digit, right?

              • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I needed this comment. Thanks. 😂

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        NOpe.

        Just got an Android update ~ half a day ago.
        Just checked the certs, all were there and enabled.

        And this is stock Android.

Programmer Humor@programming.dev

programmer_humor@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmer_humor@programming.dev

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
    • If the mod doesn’t find it funny, you’re banned. Ha-ha!.. For real: do not use the community for “statements”. There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2K users / day
  • 5.86K users / week
  • 8.87K users / month
  • 16.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 33.8K subscribers
  • 1.52K Posts
  • 30.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • Feyter@programming.dev
  • BurningTurtle@programming.dev
  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.14
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org