• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Lmao, why do people keep insisting it has 100% parity when it obviously doesnt. It might actually be usable and i wish a thousand deaths upon adobe, but claiming that its a drop in replacement is just a lie.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They say it’s gonna be 100% parity in a month. Sand Altguy also claim we gonna have AGI in the next 6 months and Melon Husk claimed there will be full self driving today. We’ll see by next month.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ll be happy to check back in a month to see which toxic cesspit provides the best approximation of Photoshop-tier quality.

        My bet isn’t with the Redditor whose profile reads “To AI haters: AI is just a tool… Adapt.” But their attitude is roughly as toxic as Adobe if you strip away the PR, so let them fight I guess

        • sepi@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The answer to “which toxic cesspit provides the best approximation of Photoshop-tier quality” is “Adobe Photoshop”

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’d guess you are right, but I don’t know because I haven’t tested it. I’d say: if this guy really devoted a solid month of focused LLM development time on the job, and knows what he’s doing, there’s a chance he’s pretty close to what is claimed in TFA. But I haven’t tested it for myself, so I just don’t know. I’m guessing you are right because most of these projects aren’t done by people who know what they’re doing, and aren’t real heavy effort even during the month they work on them.