cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/57302675

an article explaining why GNOME should support SSD, but also arguing against the reasons often given for why they shouldn’t

If someone could repost this to r/GNOME I would appreciate it, since I don’t have a reddit account.

    • termaxima@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t want a giant bar that only contains 3 icons and the name of the app. Why would you want that ?

      I have SSDs off on all my machines.

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      It creates a clear heirarchy of information too. The system owns the title bar, so any operations there are system operations.

      At one point browsers did something similar for security awareness-- real permission prompts, etc. were set a few pixels over into the main UI to establist that they were “real” and not part of the page content.

      Most of the time, we’re not so starved for pixels that we have tp be stealing from the title bar.

      Hell, we lived thtough 640x480 desktops without even the cheat of hamburger menus.

      • Björn@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most of the time, we’re not so starved for pixels that we have tp be stealing from the title bar.

        Plus, when we actually are starved for space SSD allow the system to make the necessary adjustments.

        • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          One thing that dawned on me… maybe CSD and some of the “new” window management paradigms (tiling, card style, etc.) are symbiotic. If you aren’t using the title bar for manipulating the window on a regular basis, you feel free to ignore or outright scramble it.