cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/57302675

an article explaining why GNOME should support SSD, but also arguing against the reasons often given for why they shouldn’t

If someone could repost this to r/GNOME I would appreciate it, since I don’t have a reddit account.

  • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good software should be handled like that, try looking at how the kernel does things.

    Sadly for gnome doing so does not make you automathically good software

    • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Should a desktop environment use the same philosophy as a kernel ? don’t they have different requirements ? I’m asking as a layman

      • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        The less options, the better for a new person to jump in. Modern Gnome is a DE I can recommend everyone. ‘It’s like Mac but simpler,’ I advertise it. I like it even as a pro user, though. But even if we, the pro users, couldn’t work with it, that’s okay. Many pro users hate modern Gnome, and use other environments. But having one with limited options and an opinionated design hurts nobody, and helps a lot. I can install it for an elderly parent or a friend, and they can use it without much assistance, as it’s not very far from their tablet or smartphone.

    • Björn@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      If they would just take it a step further and embraced the Kernel’s most important “don’t break userspace” rule.