There are over 213k+ potentially vulnerable internet-exposed MongoDB instances, ensuring that this exploit is web scale.

MongoDB is webscale

  • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    But if you’ve planned your app through and know beforehand you don’t need relational data, you can skip the overhead of a RDBMS.
    At least that’s what I would say if I hadn’t been in this exact situation and it later turned out we do need relational data so we had relational documents.
    Also working with MongoDB without ODM is pure pain.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Side tracking here : to me, it seems like every DB is relational, no?

      What use case would a DB used and not be relational? With my minimal experience in DB, I haven’t seen any other use cases than a relational DB.

      • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 minutes ago

        Cache-like storage, private user-specific data, blobby or otherwise schemaless data. Stuff like that. But IMO it’s a matter of time until you find a need to operate against this data relationally, and then you regret using document storage. I’ve made this mistake twice now and do not intend to make it again. I now consider document storage architecture to be a performance optimization with significant tradeoffs, and not a choice to be made by default for nearly any scenario.