• GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s like I tell everyone else that gets harassed, sexually or non-sexually: go tell a lawyer, not HR.

  • kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This doesn’t surprise me. I know a gal who reported retaliation at Google and was immediately put on a secret HR blacklist that prevented her from getting above a certain perf rating. She was later “laid off” without cause.

    She recorded her chat with HR, and this is a direct quote from the HR person: “Oh, that’s not retaliation. That’s a very specific legal construct. It sounds like what your manager is doing is more like retribution.”

  • PaddleMaster@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s easier to shun problematic women from society (in this case fire her) than to educate and hold men accountable on how women are not objects, nor property.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because “Google employee probably fired after Google acknowledges she was telling the truth about sexual harassment” isn’t quite as PC of a headline

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s used outside of UK too. I’ve seen it used in the US, for example. Usually it’s just a corporate term that says “you’re fired” but without saying that. They use terms like these all the time to try not to take accountability for fucking someone’s life up.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes, but this is a BBC article and they don’t say laid off they say “made redundant”, its not a sanitizer term in UK, it is just the legal term everyone goes by for when you lose your job.