Yes they basically made a game called f. Really nothing to with Silent Hill. Not the game play, not the story, not the presentation. No inner narrative horror, no lynchian underpinnings. It switched from internal to external pressures for the character.

In a way, I suppose that’s fine. Its a story in a different lens, not really a Silent Hill lens, but ok lets go with it.

Then they changed the gameplay. This is not a silent hill style at all. Forced repetition and combat loops. Stamina. Arena style game play. Well there goes the psychological and horror aspect AND they didnt even do it very well.

If you want to compare old video games, it is like Doki Doki Panic. Mario 2 in name only.

What parts of Silent Hill did you reflect on? What parts made you think, this is a really good Silent Hill game?

Or as other people have put it: If it had a different name, would it have mattered? I am not discussing if it is a good game or not, but is it a Silent Hill game?

Back on track? It sucked.

Maybe they should figure out why silent hill used to be good.

They made a game, but not a good silent hill game.

FPS same as always, since it is just a description.

Multiplayer FPS is what they are talking about? Seems like a convoluted headline.